Closing the regulatory gap
Under MiFID regulations, investment firms have long been able to appoint tied agents to carry out certain investment activities under their regulatory umbrella. However, in 2013, when AIFMs were granted the ability to perform MiFID activities, the tied agent permissions were not extended to them. This created a regulatory inconsistency between AIFM and MiFID firms, despite them both being authorised to perform the same type of MiFID investment activities.
When the EU AIFMD regime was introduced for fund management in 2012/2013, quite a few Gibraltar investment firms surrendered their MIFID licence and obtained AIFM authorisation instead. As a result, very few MiFID firms remained in the jurisdiction and most did not apply a business model that could accommodate tied agents. The local market was effectively left without a practical incubator route for small or emerging managers to start their businesses.
The EU has since addressed this issue with AIFMD II, which was implemented in 2024 and allows EU AIFMs with MiFID permissions to appoint tied agents under the same conditions as EU MiFID managers. Due to Brexit however, Gibraltar will not be transposing AIFMD II, therefore the inconsistency would have persisted indefinitely without local legislative action. The new amendments to the AIFM regulations serve to correct this regulatory imbalance and bring Gibraltar’s regime in line with European standards.